Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Ethics Of The Integrity Objection - 1336 Words

The Integrity Objection is a counter-argument to consequentialism first proposed by Bernard Williams in 1973. It problematizes consequentialist moral philosophy on the grounds that it forces an agent to forfeit their ‘integrity’ – their character and personal values – in order to follow an impartial moral calculus. When an agent performs an action which is morally correct according to a consequentialist calculation, they may experience guilt, sadness, or other negative emotions despite the moral rightness of what they did. Utilitarianism considers such feelings irrelevant because they are irrational. However, as Williams points out, â€Å"to regard those feelings from a purely utilitarian point of view†¦ is to lose a sense of one’s moral†¦show more content†¦Thus the former is morally culpable for the actions of the latter by virtue of being the cause of the action. Opponents of consequentialism argue that negative responsibility, and the consequentialist doctrine as a whole, is unacceptable because it reduces an agent to merely â€Å"a locus of causal intervention in the world.† Instead of being people, agents are no more than origin points of cause and effect, and their integrity is forfeit as a result. Although Williams dedicates a significant portion of his paper to illustrating the problem of integrity, he offers no defense against it. In fact, he acknowledges that life-defining projects and integrity exist, agrees that it is absurd to expect an agent to discard them in order to be moral, and then departs from the problem of integrity without further discussion. Scheffler defends against the problem of integrity by proposing a modified version of consequentialism. He first asserts that consequentialism should be the foundation of a moral theory due to the absurdity of non-consequentialist moral theories, which incorporate what he calls â€Å"agent-centered restrictions†. Agent-centered restrict ions assert that there are certain actions which are always morally impermissible, regardless of the context or the consequences of that action. These restrictions can prohibit an agentShow MoreRelatedCritisism for Rule and Act Utilitarianism1155 Words   |  5 Pages127). Alongside, â€Å"an often debated question in ethics is whether rule utilitarianism is a consistent version of utilitarianism† (Pojman, 127). The purpose of this paper will be to demonstrate how the arguments supporting utilitarianism are not as strong as some may think. The reasons to support for utilitarianism are not strong because utilitarianism is not always feasible, only takes into account end goals, conflicts with an individual’s integrity, and is incompatible with justice. To begin withRead MoreUtilitarianism And Its Flaws Of John Stuart Mill s Defends Utilitarianism Essay1307 Words   |  6 PagesChristian Mangru Professor Grindeland Ethics from a Global Perspective 7 December 2016 Utilitarianism and its Flaws John Stuart Mill’s defends utilitarianism, an ethical theory according to which, as he puts it, â€Å"actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness† (155 Ethics). In other words, actions are morally right if they make us happy and actions are morally wrong if they make us unhappy. Utilitarianism is an ethicalRead MoreThe Radio-Television News Directors Association: Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct1040 Words   |  4 PagesCODE OF ETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT RADIO-TELEVISION NEWS DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION The Radio-Television News Directors Association, wishing to foster the highest professional standards of electronic journalism, promote public understanding of and confidence in electronic journalism, and strengthen principles of journalistic freedom to gather and disseminate information, establishes this Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. PREAMBLE Professional electronic journalists should operate as trusteesRead MoreObjections to Utilitarianism1467 Words   |  6 PagesOBJECTIONS TO UTIILITARIANISM SECTION (1) INTRODUCTION We noted, last week, that UTILITARIANISM is a version of CONSEQUENTIALISM in that it holds that the RIGHT action (in any given situation) is the action WHICH HAS THE WHICH HAS THE BEST CONSEQUENCES; CONSEQUENTIALIST ethical theories may be contrastedRead MorePersonal Code Of Ethics Essay1154 Words   |  5 PagesMy personal Code of Ethics includes Respect, Integrity, Fairness and Caring. Some situations in life may be subjective, but what matters is making sure the results are fair for all parties. Through the years I have found identifying and setting personal values to be increasingly difficult since the right decisions aren’t always appeasing to all that are involved. Every decision made or not made is definitive of myself, and in believing so removing the need to conform to standards imposed by societyRead MoreEthics, The Solicitors Regulation Authority1055 Words   |  5 Pagesin making citizens virtuous†. Laws of conduct used to govern society are formed by what is perceived as virtuous and just. Legal professionals are not only governed by laws of the land but are morally and legally constrained by a stringent code of ethics, known as the Solicitors Regulation Authority. There are ten principles that focus on 5 main core responsibilities a solicitor has with their client, business, regulator, others, application, waivers and interpretations. A legal professional mustRead MoreSears Auto Center Scandal1475 Words   |  6 PagesLGST001 Ââ€" Ethics and Social Responsibility Sears Auto Center Scandal Managing Business Ethics Text (pp.207 - 210) Ethical Decision-making Issue: Should Sears remove its commission-based compensation scheme? Group Stand: The majority of the group believes that Ellen should be removed from the team. Support for Motion: Rawls theory/Egalitarianism The underlying inequality is that car owners are paying for repair services they do not require while Sears benefits by earning higherRead MoreThe Use Of Diuretics And Its Effects On Quality Of Life1362 Words   |  6 Pagesquantity of laxatives needed, which reduces the side effects and dangers of laxative over-use (Harrington and Haskvitz, 2006; Rodrigues-Fisher et al., 1993) Ethical Frameworks and Principles Ethical Frameworks Utilitarianism The Utilitarian approach to ethics states that an action is good if it produces more good than harm for the most people (Santa Clara University, 2015). Moving from pharmacological treatment to non-pharmacological prevention of constipation is supported by this approach because non-pharmacologicalRead MoreEssay on Does Utilitarianism Lead to Extreme Self Sacrifice?900 Words   |  4 Pagesharms for all affected impartially. In Utilitarianism, J.S. Mill was trying to show that actions and institutions should increase the overall amount of happiness in the world, and stressed the importance of utilitarianism as the first principle in ethics. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well, Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. According to Smart, the act-utilitarian is to regard rules as mere rules of thumb, and willRead MoreRole of Ethics792 Words   |  4 PagesExplain the role of ethics and social responsibility in developing a strategic plan, considering stakeholder needs. Society expects businesses to be responsible both socially and ethically. â€Å"Businesses are supposed to respect the environment, pursue fairness in dealing with internal and external customers, and strive to improve their communities† (Romani, 1998). Ignoring the ethical standards will have an adverse impact on businesses as well as the consumers. Although some unethical practices are

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.